Sunday, September 26, 2010

Sorry, Charlie, for the imposition...

The Minnesota Family Council and the National Organization for Marriage are running a TV ad complaining that gubernatorial candidates Mark Dayton (DFL) and Tom Horner (Ind.) favor "imposing gay 'marriage' on Minnesotans" by not supporting the right of the people of Minnesota vote to amend the state constitution to ban same-sex marriage.

Interestingly, the ad opens with shots of a women's suffrage rally, a banner from the Selma march, and a shot of the U.S. Constitution fading to Dr. Martin Luther King, trumpeting the importance of the right to vote.

Watch:


So here are This Week's Discussion Questions:

How do you think a vote on voting rights for women would have gone around the turn of the 20th century?


How do you think a vote on civil rights for blacks would have gone in Alabama in 1965?


Is this a road you really want to go down?


Really?


Please keep the discussion civil and do not wander off into "Would this 'imposition' turn my traditional marriage 'gay'?" or "Biblical view of marriage? How many wives did Solomon have again? Not counting concubines, of course."

Discuss.

1 comment:

fecknom said...

How does one teach 'gay marriage' to first and second graders?

I'm really intrigued.

So 'straight marriage' is already part of their curriculum?

Is it okay if we teach gay marriage alongside straight marriage, as an alternate theory? With our own gay science to support it, saying that in the earliest forms of prehistoric gay marriage, half of the men wore saddles, just like their pet dinosaurs?